Ralston v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.3d 1060 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Washington v. Davis · Johnson v. Jones · Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney · Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once an individual defendant asserts qualified immunity, the plaintiff carries a two-part burden to show: (1) that the defendant's actions violated a federal constitutional or statutory right, and, if so, (2) that the right was clearly established at the time of the defendant's unlawful conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(citing Chaplinsky ) ). The denial of qualified immunity at the summary judgment phase may give rise to interlocutory appellate jurisdiction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“assert[ed] the district court erred in determining a reasonable juror could conclude he acted intentionally or consciously”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perry v. Durborow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.