United States v. Banks’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.3d 998 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Payton v. New York · Jones v. United States · Horton v. California · Huddleston v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“required T-Mobile to disclose ... real-time [cell-site location information] and to determine, in real time, the location of [a] cell phone”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“look in closets and other spaces immediately adjoining the place of arrest from which an attack could be immediately launched.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Generally, officers can seize any incriminating items that they find in plain view during a protective sweep.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.