Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

884 So. 2d 138

Kendricks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-07-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2006

1 state decisions

Relies on Pavey v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-07-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CASANUEVA, Judge.

¶1We affirm without prejudice to Ken-dricks’ right to refile his motion for post-conviction relief with proper oath. Since it appears that the two-year time limit for Kendricks to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 has expired, Kendricks shall have thirty days from the date of the mandate following this opinion to file a corrected motion and memorandum of law. See Pavey v. State, 720 So.2d 563 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

¶2Affirmed without prejudice.

FULMER and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur.
/884/so2d/138 · .json · Public domain