Kleppinger v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Cronic · 441 So. 2d 1083 - Livingston v. State · 733 So. 2d 963 - Cottle v. State · 801 So. 2d 906 - Downs v. Moore · 403 So. 2d 355 - Tafero v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he finding of prejudice turns on whether disqualification would have been required, not on whether the outcome of a new trial would have been different.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] legally sufficient motion to disqualify must demonstrate `some actual bias or prejudice so as to create a reasonable fear that a fair trial cannot be had.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“he would have accepted the State's plea offer if he had been properly advised ... state[d] a prima facie claim of ineffective assistance of counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Revell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.