Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 SO2D 186 - Simpson v. Young

Simpson v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 716 So. 2d 842 - Keitel v. Keitel · LaLoggia-VonHegel v. VonHegel · Leonard v. State · Wells v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We affirm the order -7- of contempt, but remand to the circuit court to strike the finding that the Simpsons were in contempt for moving the children to South Carolina.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.