Fassy v. Crowley’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 217 - Holly v. Auld · 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 658 So. 2d 523 - Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs · 509 So. 2d 1097 - Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage · A. R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, as Admrx.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A departure from the essential requirements of the law necessary for the issuance of a writ of certiorari is something more than a simple legal error. There must be a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) a departure from the essential requirements of the law, (2) resulting in material injury for the remainder of the trial (3) that cannot be corrected on post-judgment appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Unlike the application of incorrect law, 'a misapplication of the correct law or an erroneous interpretation of a law does not rise to the necessary level,' i.e., 'a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.