Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 So. 2d 504 - Faunce v. State

884 So. 2d 504 - Faunce v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Sokolow · 626 So. 2d 185 - Popple v. State · 537 So. 2d 1080 - Gipson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A reviewing court must accept the trial court's findings of fact in an order on a motion to suppress, so long as those findings are supported by the record. However, a suppression order that turns on an issue of law is reviewed by a de novo standard of review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To justify an investigative detention, a law enforcement officer must have a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime. A hunch or a mere suspicion is not enough.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether a particular set of facts can justify a finding that a police officer had a reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigative detention is a question of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.