884 So. 2d 787 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) the opportunity of the witness to view the accused at the time of the crime; (2) the degree of attention exhibited by the witness; (3) the accuracy of the witness's prior description of the criminal; (4) the level of certainty exhibited by the witness at the confrontation; and (5) the length of the time between the crime and the confrontation.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Guerrero v. State · 962 So. 2d 110 - Young v. State

2. “whether or not substantial credible evidence supports the trial court's findings that, considering the totality of the circumstances, in-court identification testimony was not impermissibly tainted.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Guerrero v. State · 962 So. 2d 110 - Young v. State

3. “PRE-TRIAL SHOW-UP AND PHOTOGRAPHIC LINEUPS? STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶ 9. The standard of review for suppression hearings on matters of pre-trial identification is”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Guerrero v. State