Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 So. 2d 83 - Michael v. State

884 So. 2d 83 - Michael v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 798 So. 2d 870 - Nardone v. State · Sexton v. State · Mendez v. State · Hinojosa v. State · 572 So. 2d 16 - Phillips v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ase law recognizes that exploration of bias in a criminal case allows for cross-examination into an `officer's use of excessive force in other cases,' `[w]here there is an issue of whether or not excessive force was used by a law enforcement officer' in the case at hand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to avoid another complaint which could [lead] to disciplinary action”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “officer's use of excessive force in other cases,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.