Ex Parte Bertram’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Staples v. United States · Castillo v. United States · United States v. Resnick · 602 So. 2d 344 - IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc. · 392 So. 2d 1274 - Watson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' Castillo v. United States , 530 U.S. 120 , 131 , 120 S.Ct. 2090 , 147 L.Ed.2d 94 (2000) (paraphrasing Staples v. United States , 511 U.S. 600 , 619 n. 17, 114 S.Ct. 1793 , 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994)).”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cockrell v. State · Ankrom v. State“(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle while:”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Holbert · Hankins v. State“"[T]he word conviction means conviction of violating this section everywhere the word conviction appears within the section, including where the word conviction appears in Subsection (h) defining the felony. Such a construction would require Subsection (h) be read to mean `On a fourth or subsequent conviction [of violating this section], a person convicted of violating this section shall be guilty of a Class C felony and punished by [stating the penalty].'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.