¶1Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
884 S.W.2d 340
Weekley v. State
Decided August 23, 1994
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1994-08-23
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1994-08-23
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →