Dillard v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
885 F.2d 1549 · 1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · National League of Cities v. Usery · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority · Maryland v. Wirtz · Steiner v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] representative ... need not be a formal or recognized collective bargaining agent as long as it is a representative designated by the employees....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'intention that the question of whether employees have a representative ... shall be determined in accordance with State or local law and practices.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the representative need not be a formal or recognized bargaining agent as long as the representative is designated by the employees.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.