Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 885 F.2d 317 - Bubis v. Blanton

Bubis v. Blanton’s Empirical Analysis

885 F.2d 317 · 1989

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
November 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2019

3 federal appellate ·

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. · Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. · Cryts v. French · Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · Jannotti v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “refers to the plaintiff's participation in the same wrongdoing as the defendant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The test for determining whether a potential competitor has a business interest protected by antitrust laws is whether he had both the intention and preparedness to compete.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “interest in [the store] at the time of the attempted transfer of the liquor license was unlawful”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.