Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 885 F.2d 349 - In Re B.L. Peregoy, Robert H. Carr, Douglas C. Peregoy, and Barbara Ann Peregoy

In Re B.L. Peregoy, Robert H. Carr, Douglas C. Peregoy, and Barbara Ann Peregoy’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1998
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · Rodriquez v. United States · Lunn v. F. W. Woolworth Co. · Griffing v. Bianchi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We also conclude that summary judgment would have been appropriate in this matter on the basis of res judicata or collateral estoppel. The Humphries heirs have had their day(s) in court, and then some.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.