Securities and Exchange Commission v. Simpson E’s Empirical Analysis
885 F.2d 390 · 1989
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2011
10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · In re Oliver · Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Shillitani v. United States · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“certifies that the judge saw or heard the conduct constituting the contempt and that it was committed in the actual presence of the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the contempt charged involves disrespect to or criticism of a judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“to vindicate the authority of the court,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.