Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 885 F.2d 584 - Stevens Technical Services, Inc. v. SS Brooklyn

Stevens Technical Services, Inc. v. SS Brooklyn’s Empirical Analysis

885 F.2d 584 · 1989

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
4
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp. of America (1990), Bates v. Long Island Railroad (1993)

22 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

4501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · Scarano v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey · Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance · Allen v. Zurich Insurance · Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the court determines that the alleged offending party engaged in 'fast and loose' behavior which undermined the integrity of the court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Judicial estoppel precludes a party from asserting a position in a current legal proceeding which is contrary to the position that party previously asserted in another.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was adopted in some manner by the court in the prior litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.