Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

885 F.2d 864

Docket No. 89-7603.

Carroll v. Baker

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 25, 1986. Decided Aug. 31, 1989.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-08-31

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ronald Joseph Fox, Jr., Ronald E. Tillmann, Edward G. McCabe Mark Uhles, and Michael Kochlany v. Dynamark Security Centers, Inc., Wayne E. Alter, Jr., Ronald Joseph Fox, Jr., Ronald E. Tillmann, Edward G. McCabe Mark Uhles, and Michael Kochlany v. Dynamark Security Centers, Inc., Wayne E. Alter, Jr.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-08-31

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William Hunt Carroll, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

William Hunt Carroll appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. The district court correctly treated the action as a habeas petition challenging the duration of confinement. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, modifying the order to indicate the dismissal of the action is without prejudice to Carroll's refiling upon demonstrating exhaustion of state remedies. Carroll v. Baker, CA-89-208-CRT-BR (E.D.N.C., March 24, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

/885/f2d/864 · .json · Public domain