Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

885 F.2d 864

Docket No. 89-7107.

Donati v. Jarvis

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 10, 1989. Decided Sept. 5, 1989.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-09-05

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Ronald Joseph Fox, Jr., Ronald E. Tillmann, Edward G. McCabe Mark Uhles, and Michael Kochlany v. Dynamark Security Centers, Inc., Wayne E. Alter, Jr., Ronald Joseph Fox, Jr., Ronald E. Tillmann, Edward G. McCabe Mark Uhles, and Michael Kochlany v. Dynamark Security Centers, Inc., Wayne E. Alter, Jr.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-09-05

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael E. Donati, appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, (Office of the Attorney General), for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Michael E. Donati seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Donati v. Jarvis, C/A No. 88-134-H (W.D.Va. Mar. 29, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/885/f2d/864 · .json · Public domain