Jimenez-Cedillo v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
885 F.3d 292 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But where the agency has failed to provide even that minimal level of analysis, its action is arbitrary and capricious and so cannot carry the force of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not only violates a statute but also independently violates a moral norm.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] reviewing court may not speculate on reasons that might have supported a change in agency position [ ]or supply a reasoned basis for the agency's action that the agency itself has not given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.