United States v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
885 F.3d 449 · 2018
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Relies on Molina-Martinez v. United States · United States v. Shaffer · United States v. Carani · United States v. Cureton · United States v. Volpentesta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he government . . . presented evidence of [defendant]'s sophisticated understanding of computers and software”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no reasonable juror could have found there was not a sufficient nexus between the property and the offense. There was no question in this case that the specific computer listed in the forfeiture order was the one used by [the defendant] containing the illegal files.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must determine before the jury begins deliberating whether either party requests that the jury be retained to determine the forfeitability of specific property if it returns a guilty verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.