Lopez-Lopez v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
885 F.3d 49 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad · Lopez de Hincapie v. Gonzales · Singh v. Mukasey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general rule courts and agencies are not required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the results they reach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“centrally motivated by a desire [for] profit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.