Sanchez v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
885 F.3d 782 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1357 (§ 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Rochin v. People of California · Hernandez v. New York · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · Herring v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen, absent federal direction or authorization, a state or local officer detains or arrests someone based solely on a civil immigration violation, the officer violates that individual's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“would require IJs to determine the level of authority a given state or local official had to enforce federal immigration law and to decide which test applies where officers with different authorities jointly execute an immigration action. It is often difficult to define these categories with clarity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the likely additional deterrent value of the 'full' exclusionary rule, as opposed to the 'egregious violation' rule, is appreciable or substantial enough to justify its application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.