Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 885 F. Supp. 881 - Silling v. Erwin

885 F. Supp. 881 - Silling v. Erwin’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Asberry v. United States Postal Service · Kerr v. Lunsford · Thompson v. Soles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he term 'personal transactions and communications’ has been given a broad interpretation which includes every method whereby one person may derive impressions or information from the conduct, condition or language of another.” Silling v. Erwin, 885 F.Supp. 881, 885 (S.D.W.Va.1995) (Haden, C.J.) (citing Kuhn v. Shreeve, 141 W.Va. 170 , 89 S.E.2d 685 (1955); Miami Coal Co. v. Hudson, 175 W.Va. 153 , 332 S.E.2d 114 (1985)), aff'd, 83 F.3d 416 (4th Cir.1996). Given the breadth of the meaning of the term “transaction,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a beneficiary who accepts such benefits is bound to adopt the whole contents of the will and is estopped to challenge its validity,” where”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.