885 F. Supp. 2d 228 - Coltrane v. Lappin’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1402 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Smith v. United States · Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt · Clark v. Library of Congress
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The pendent venue doctrine is an exception to the general rule that 'a plaintiff must demonstrate proper venue with respect to each cause of action and each defendant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nabong v. Paddayuman“favored over dismissal when the plaintiff is proceeding pro se.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.