Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

885 So. 2d 925

State v. Rodriguez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 13, 2004

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-10-13

Relies on 534 So. 2d 393 - State v. Pennington · Florida Bar Re Amendment to Article XI, Florida Bar Integration Rule (Rules of Discipline) · 445 So. 2d 605 - State v. Del Gaudio

Decided 2004-10-13

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court’s finding that the State’s discovery violations prejudiced the defendant, Jose Rodriguez, in the preparation of his defense was not supported by the record. Therefore, the trial court abused its discretion by granting the defendant’s motion for discharge for violation of the speedy trial rule. State v. Guzman, 667 So.2d 989 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); State v. Brown, 527 So.2d 209, 210 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 534 So.2d 398 (Fla.1988); State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So.2d 605, 608 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 453 So.2d 45 (Fla.1984).

¶2Reversed.

/885/so2d/925 · .json · Public domain