¶1Nasedra Lumpkin challenges the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to his right to file a legally suffi*932cient motion addressing his claim of entitlement to jail credit. See Trapkin v. State, 830 So.2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); See also Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003); Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).
885 So. 2d 931
Lumpkin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 20, 2004
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-10-20
Relies on 491 So. 2d 543 - Daniels v. State · Gethers v. State · Hardy v. Douglas
Decided 2004-10-20