Parham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · Santobello v. New York · Benton v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“improper or selective prosecution”); Parham v. State, 885 S.W.2d 375, 382 (Tenn.Crim.App.), per. app. denied (Tenn.1994) (“the state is not required to engage in plea bargaining”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Turner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.