State v. Briggs’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
31 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Berger v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen evidence ⅜ * * may nonetheless be helpful to [the] defendant's effective cross-examination of a witness, a defendant’s -right to that evidence arises from the right of confrontation, and thus becomes an issue ‘only when a defendant is improperly denied the ability to confront and to effectively cross-examine an adverse witness at trial,’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a defendant must show that `there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McManus“the trial justice is in the best position to determine whether any harm resulted from noncompliance with discovery motions * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McManus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.