Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 F.2d 1514 - Barilla v. Ervin

Barilla v. Ervin’s Empirical Analysis

886 F.2d 1514 · 1989

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 12 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Miller National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center (1994), Gates

32 federal appellate · 12 district · 2 state decisions

39019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Sosna v. Iowa · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · Dunn v. Blumstein · Honig v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot be divested of its obligation to consider the issue of mootness on the ground that the timing or manner in which a party has raised the issue is somehow procedurally improper”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “capable of repetition yet evading review”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Gates · Gates
  3. “need only show that it is reasonable to expect that [it] will engage in conduct that will once again give rise to the assertedly moot dispute; [it] need not show that there is a 'demonstrated probability' that the dispute will recur.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.