Cooney v. Fulcomer’s Empirical Analysis
886 F.2d 41 · 1989
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2014
7 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Hill v. United States · Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Davis v. United States · United Families of America v. Kendrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall be only for the purpose of permitting prosecution on the charge or charges ... which form the basis of the detainer or detainers or for prosecution on any other charge or charges arising out of the same transaction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morrison v. State · State v. Steele“is a compact which has been adopted by 48 states, the District of Columbia, and the United States, to encourage expeditious and orderly disposition of outstanding criminal charges filed against a person incarcerated in a different jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCandless v. Vaughn“The IAD [was] ... approved by Congress pursuant to the Compact Clause [and] ... is a federal law.... Thus, the federal courts have habeas corpus jurisdiction ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCandless v. Vaughn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.