Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 F.2d 451 - In re Boston Shipyard Corp.

In re Boston Shipyard Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

886 F.2d 451 · 1989

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably VKK Corp. v. National Football League (2001), Alliant Techsystems, Inc. v. United States (1999)

19 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions

2701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bowsher v. SmithKline Corp. · Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp. · Johnston v. Holiday Inns, Inc. · Ethridge v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “acting upon it, performing under it, or affirmatively acknowledging it.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[a] contract or release, the execution of which is induced by duress, is voidable, not void, and the person claiming duress must act promptly to repudiate the contract or release or he will be deemed to have waived his right to do so.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Financial incapacity, however, is generally not considered beyond the contractor’s control, [cite omitted] This rule is understandable, as a contractor who makes and then accepts a bid should have the financial ability to perform. But, as with most rules, there are always exceptions. Thus, if the financial problems are caused by factors beyond the contractor’s control, or by the government’s actions themselves, then the contractor’s default may be justified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.