Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 F.2d 766 - International Union United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. State of Michigan

International Union United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. State of Michigan’s Empirical Analysis

886 F.2d 766 · 1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
September 2011
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2011

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters · Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust · Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio · Bazemore v. Friday · County of Washington v. Gunther

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “come within the discretion of the trial court and do not amount to reversible error unless there is an abuse of discretion and substantial prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.