Baas v. Fewless’s Empirical Analysis
886 F.3d 1088 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2271 · 18 U.S.C. § 2721 (§ 300002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 2722 (§ 300002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Hope v. Pelzer · Thomas v. Cooper Lighting, Inc. · Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no genuine dispute as to any material fact and [that it] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“submitted evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.