Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 F.3d 1132 - Crocker v. Beatty

Crocker v. Beatty’s Empirical Analysis

886 F.3d 1132 · 2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Pearson v. Callahan · United States v. Place · Minnesota v. Olson · United States v. Tobin · Cottone v. Jenne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would permit police officers to seize now-ubiquitous cell phones from any person, in any place, at any time, so long as the phone contains photographs or videos that could serve as evidence of a crime-simply because the 'nature' of the device used to capture that evidence might result in it being lost.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.