Keena v. Groupon, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
886 F.3d 360 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph · McLish v. Roff · Microsoft Corp. v. Baker · United States v. Babbitt · Evans v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Keena unsuccessfully sought the district court's certification of an interlocutory appeal. Then, in another creative 'voluntary-dismissal tactic,' Keena's lawyer sought to preempt the denial of interlocutory review by voluntarily dismissing Keena's complaint with prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Plaintiffs in putative class actions cannot transform a tentative interlocutory order ... into a final judgment within the meaning of § 1291 simply by dismissing their claims with prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Keena's voluntary-dismissal tactic also fails to account for the longstanding principle that a party is not entitled to appeal from a consensual dismissal of her claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.