Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 F.3d 375 - Sky Cable, LLC v. DirecTV, Inc.

Sky Cable, LLC v. DirecTV, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

886 F.3d 375 · 2018

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Salve Regina College v. Russell · Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View · BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation · North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc. · First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permits a court to render an individual liable in a judgment against a business entity in which the individual has an interest, when the entity is in fact a mere instrumentality or alter ego of the individual.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[R]everse veil piercing attaches liability to the entity for a judgment against the individuals who hold an ownership interest in that entity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an LLC that is the alter ego of its sole member is properly before the court when the court has jurisdiction over that member.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.