Baek v. Clausen’s Empirical Analysis
886 F.3d 652 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Kerotest Mfg Co v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co · 184 Ill. 2d 290 - River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland Park · 114 Ill. 2d 107 - Ballweg v. City of Springfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“proceed in parallel, the first to reach judgment controls the other, through claim preclusion (res judicata)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Ranieri
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.