Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 F.3d 674 - Davis v. Anthony, Inc.

Davis v. Anthony, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

886 F.3d 674 · 2018

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12182 (§ 302 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12188 (§ 308 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Murphy v. Hunt · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins · Osborn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Davis cannot use the violation encountered in the parking space to expand her standing to sue for unencountered violations inside the [restaurant] that never injured her.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A case becomes moot-and therefore no longer a 'Case' or 'Controversy' for purposes of Article III-'when the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.