Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 NE2D 16 - Forgey v. State

Forgey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 771 · 18 U.S.C. § 702

Relies on Anglemyer v. State · McCann v. State · Powell v. State · Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. · Hubbell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] single aggravating factor is sufficient to justify the imposition of consecutive sentences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.