Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 P.2d 302 - People v. Taylor

People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schubert v. People · People v. Johnson · People v. Etts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who is confined for an offense prior to the imposition of sentence for said offense is entitled to credit against the term of his sentence for the entire period of such confinement. At the time of sentencing, the court shall make a finding of the amount of presentence confinement to which the offender is entitled and shall include such finding in the mittimus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.