Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 SO2D 1116 - State v. Sherman

State v. Sherman’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Green · State v. Chopin · State v. Martin · 648 So. 2d 366 - State v. Brooks · 410 So. 2d 745 - State v. Beals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]s a general rule, an appellate court may review the testimony at trial in determining the correctness of the trial court's pre-trial ruling on a motion to suppress. State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), 655 So.2d 272, 280 ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95), 648 So.2d 366, 372 ; State v. Martin, 595 So.2d 592, 596 (La.1992).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.