Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 SO2D 326 - Locklear v. FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION

Locklear v. FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harmelin v. Michigan · Hudson v. United States · United States v. Ward · Amos v. Gunn · State v. Glatzmayer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “court must first ask whether the legislature, `in establishing the penalizing mechanism, indicated either expressly or impliedly a preference for one label or the other.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Clause protects only against the imposition of multiple criminal punishments for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.