Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

886 So. 2d 336

Hinton v. Hinton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 2004

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-11-12

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2015

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-11-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court’s order dated and filed November 18, 2003, is affirmed. We write to bring to the attention of the trial court that the order refers to an Exhibit “A” that was to be attached to the order but was inadvertently omitted. We remand for amendment of the order so that the missing Exhibit “A”, an amortization schedule, may be attached.

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
/886/so2d/336 · .json · Public domain