Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 886 SO2D 472 - Coleman v. Ranger

Coleman v. Ranger’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 704 So. 2d 1161 - Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. · 844 So. 2d 376 - Mullen v. Enterprises

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The obvious purpose of extending compensation coverage to an independent contractor under the circumstances described’ in [Section 23:1021(7) ] was to prevent an employer from avoiding liability under the act by contracting with an independent contractor for the execution of work undertaken by the employer which was part of the employer’s trade, business or occupation .... We therefore conclude that an independent contractor is covered under the workmen’s compensation law only when a substantial part of his work time is spent in manual labor in carrying 1 inout the terms of his contract with the principal and the work performed by him is a part of the principal’s trade, business or occupation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.