Langston v. Hayden’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2019
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kennedy v. Dixon · General Box Co. v. Missouri Utilities Co. · Scott v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Travelers Indemnity Company v. Chumbley · McKenzie v. Missouri Stables, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When, as here, workers’ compensation benefits are claimed in one state for an accident which occurred in another, the law generally states that the question of whether and to what extent the employer or the insurer is entitled to subrogation or reimbursement is to be determined according to the provisions of the workers’ compensation law under which the compensation for the employee’s injury was paid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If the law of a foreign state violates our public policy, as a general rule, it will not be enforced by our state courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.