Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

887 F.2d 1079

Docket No. 88-2210.

Gilbert v. Bach

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 18, 1989. Decided: Aug. 17, 1989.

This page is marked noindex.

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Kirby v. Ge Currie

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-08-17

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James H. Gilbert, appellant pro se.

Ronald Gordon Dawson (Smith, Somerville & Case), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

James H. Gilbert appeals from the district court's order dismissing his suit filed pursuant to diversity of citizenship jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gilbert v. Bach, C/A No. 88-2987 (D.Md. Oct. 11, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/887/f2d/1079 · .json · Public domain