Northern Wire Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
887 F.2d 1313 · 1989
Citation profile
32 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. P*I*E Nationwide, Inc. (1991), National Labor Relations Board v. Electro-Voice, Inc. (1996)
32 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co. · Eisenstadt v. Baker · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because these acts reasonably tend to coerce employees in the exercise of their rights, regardless of whether they do, in fact, coerce.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A strike that is caused in whole or in part by an employer's unfair labor practices is an unfair labor practice strike.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The dispositive question is whether the employees, in deciding to go on strike, were motivated in part by the unfair labor practices committed by their employer, not whether, without that motivation, the employees might have struck for some other reason.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.