Moody v. Holman’s Empirical Analysis
887 F.3d 1281 · 2018
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Bell v. Hood · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when standing becomes an issue on a motion to dismiss, general factual allegations of injury resulting from the defendant's conduct may be sufficient to show standing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“But that argument-which goes to the meaning of the [bankruptcy laws] and the legal availability of a certain kind of relief-confuses mootness with the merits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he reference in our earlier cases to lack of standing is ... best seen as shorthand for holding that the prisoners in question, as a matter of substantive law, did not have a claim that would entitle them to habeas relief”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.