Wright v. Musanti’s Empirical Analysis
887 F.3d 577 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District · Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis · Broughton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“purpose of correcting the [District Court's] error”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dhinsa v. Krueger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.