Ramirez v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
887 F.3d 693 · 2018
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1426 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Taylor v. United States · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · United States v. Mead Corp. · Descamps v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an alien has an opportunity to raise a claim in administrative proceedings but does not do so, he fails to exhaust his administrative remedies as to that claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shaw v. Sessions“final order of removal only if ... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shaw v. Sessions“subsidiary legal arguments, or arguments by extension, that were not made below”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shaw v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.